Passengers refuse to fly without wingtip

This story is ridiculous! Passengers of a SriLankan Airlines A340 refused to fly without its wingtip and started “a minor revolt”.
The wingtip was removed after it sliced through the wing of a British Airways 747 one day earlier. The crew insisted that it’s just a aerodynamic part to keep fuel costs low and that the plane could fly just fine without it, but passengers weren’t buying it and left the plane. Continue at bostonherald.com …

… stupid, stupid passengers …

2 Responses to “Passengers refuse to fly without wingtip”


  1. 1 Kip Nov 12th, 2007 at 5:08 pm

    Yep, that’s pretty nuts. While it’s not the PREFERRED option, indeed, an A340 (or just about any other winglet-equipped aircraft) is perfectly airworthy without the winglet, as long as there is no damage to the wing itself. The condition might create a little more drag, and burn a little more fuel, but other than that, good to go.

  2. 2 FlyBoy Nov 16th, 2007 at 7:09 pm

    The wingtip isn’t “preferred”, it’s required. It was part of the aircraft when it was certified and without it, the aircraft isn’t in the “as-certified” condition and therefor is not airworthy.


Contact