http://blog.flightstory.net/701/airbus-files-patent-for-trijet/ The Aviation Blog Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:04:15 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2 http://blog.flightstory.net/701/airbus-files-patent-for-trijet/#comment-29777 KMHG Sat, 19 Apr 2008 23:56:32 +0000 http://blog.flightstory.net/701/airbus-files-patent-for-trijet/#comment-29777 That design could solve the deep-stall problem on trijets That design could solve the deep-stall problem on trijets

]]> http://blog.flightstory.net/701/airbus-files-patent-for-trijet/#comment-30008 Jack Mon, 21 Apr 2008 02:17:56 +0000 http://blog.flightstory.net/701/airbus-files-patent-for-trijet/#comment-30008 I like the idea. I wonder what the fuel burn will be like? I like the idea. I wonder what the fuel burn will be like?

]]> http://blog.flightstory.net/701/airbus-files-patent-for-trijet/#comment-30155 F-14Ds Rock! Anytime, Baby! Remember the Tomcat! Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:29:44 +0000 http://blog.flightstory.net/701/airbus-files-patent-for-trijet/#comment-30155 for some reason, i expected the tri-jet design to be, idk, sleeker, more aesthetically pleasing. and in this Airbus has failed. but who knows, maybe the production version will look better. for some reason, i expected the tri-jet design to be, idk, sleeker, more aesthetically pleasing. and in this Airbus has failed. but who knows, maybe the production version will look better.

]]> http://blog.flightstory.net/701/airbus-files-patent-for-trijet/#comment-30191 Michael Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:20:19 +0000 http://blog.flightstory.net/701/airbus-files-patent-for-trijet/#comment-30191 I really doubt that it will actually go into production. Do you see some market for a tri-jet? We already have 2-engine wide-bodies like 767/777/787/A330/A350 with better fuel efficiency instead of using 3 engines. Even in the cargo sector the 777F is going to replace the tri-jets MD11/DC10. Who needs a tri-jet and for what purpose? I really doubt that it will actually go into production. Do you see some market for a tri-jet? We already have 2-engine wide-bodies like 767/777/787/A330/A350 with better fuel efficiency instead of using 3 engines. Even in the cargo sector the 777F is going to replace the tri-jets MD11/DC10.
Who needs a tri-jet and for what purpose?

]]> http://blog.flightstory.net/701/airbus-files-patent-for-trijet/#comment-30583 Hotrod Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:15:39 +0000 http://blog.flightstory.net/701/airbus-files-patent-for-trijet/#comment-30583 Who needs a trijet and for what purpose? I am thinking medium range lift in hot and high environments, multi engine safety on short to medium range overwater routes, super high density charter flights over medium range. I can't see it ever being built as I think that the range of customers needing that sort of performance is quite limited... Who needs a trijet and for what purpose? I am thinking medium range lift in hot and high environments, multi engine safety on short to medium range overwater routes, super high density charter flights over medium range. I can’t see it ever being built as I think that the range of customers needing that sort of performance is quite limited…

]]>