<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chinese Aircraft Look-A-Likes</title>
	<link>http://blog.flightstory.net/526/chinese-aircraft-look-a-likes/</link>
	<description>The Aviation Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 23:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: F-14Ds Rock! Anytime, Baby! Remember the Tomcat!</title>
		<link>http://blog.flightstory.net/526/chinese-aircraft-look-a-likes/#comment-13574</link>
		<author>F-14Ds Rock! Anytime, Baby! Remember the Tomcat!</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.flightstory.net/526/chinese-aircraft-look-a-likes/#comment-13574</guid>
					<description>very thought-provoking, and China does have a history for copying the work of others: ever heard of the iClone?  basically, a Chinese iPhone, but some say it is even better.  and many cars have been "cloned" and modified by the Chinese, some of which actually reportedly run better.  but the Super Frelon/Z8 thing isn't anything new, because the Chinese military effectively bought some Super Frelons from Aerospatiale for use as transports and ASW platforms.  whether they actually manufactured some themselves under license (or not; the Chinese also have a reputation for ignoring licensing deals), I do not know

again, a good post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very thought-provoking, and China does have a history for copying the work of others: ever heard of the iClone?  basically, a Chinese iPhone, but some say it is even better.  and many cars have been &#8220;cloned&#8221; and modified by the Chinese, some of which actually reportedly run better.  but the Super Frelon/Z8 thing isn&#8217;t anything new, because the Chinese military effectively bought some Super Frelons from Aerospatiale for use as transports and ASW platforms.  whether they actually manufactured some themselves under license (or not; the Chinese also have a reputation for ignoring licensing deals), I do not know</p>
<p>again, a good post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiinalaisia kaksosia at Kiitotie.net</title>
		<link>http://blog.flightstory.net/526/chinese-aircraft-look-a-likes/#comment-13653</link>
		<author>Kiinalaisia kaksosia at Kiitotie.net</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.flightstory.net/526/chinese-aircraft-look-a-likes/#comment-13653</guid>
					<description>[...] Koko lista täällä. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Koko lista täällä. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miguel V.</title>
		<link>http://blog.flightstory.net/526/chinese-aircraft-look-a-likes/#comment-15424</link>
		<author>Miguel V.</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 13:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.flightstory.net/526/chinese-aircraft-look-a-likes/#comment-15424</guid>
					<description>Other sources in the NET point out that both Chinese fighters (FC-1 &#38; J-10) area heavily influenced by a russian project sometimes called Mig-33 (not the actual Mig-33), which was basically a single engined Mig-29.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other sources in the NET point out that both Chinese fighters (FC-1 &amp; J-10) area heavily influenced by a russian project sometimes called Mig-33 (not the actual Mig-33), which was basically a single engined Mig-29.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Centrist</title>
		<link>http://blog.flightstory.net/526/chinese-aircraft-look-a-likes/#comment-65983</link>
		<author>Centrist</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 16:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.flightstory.net/526/chinese-aircraft-look-a-likes/#comment-65983</guid>
					<description>This is a great example of people choosing to see what they want to see. As for the helicopters, China has agreements with European copter makers and produces them under license.

As for the J-10, it is based off the Israeli Lavi, but is larger, has all new avionics, and a different engine/intake.

The FC-1 is completely unrelated to the US F-20.

China's arj-21 as you can see, has different engines, a differently shaped tail, different size and shape wings from the DC-9. They are not alike at all.

The China CS-star is someone's model. No such plane exists, so comparing it is useless. Besides, it does look anything alike.

My point is, if it has wings, a tail, engines, and a fuselage, all civilian aircraft of the same class look almost identical. Compare Airbus planes with Boeing if you don't believe me. Just because it is Chinese doesn't make it a copy. The Japanese have copied american and European designs in the past too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great example of people choosing to see what they want to see. As for the helicopters, China has agreements with European copter makers and produces them under license.</p>
<p>As for the J-10, it is based off the Israeli Lavi, but is larger, has all new avionics, and a different engine/intake.</p>
<p>The FC-1 is completely unrelated to the US F-20.</p>
<p>China&#8217;s arj-21 as you can see, has different engines, a differently shaped tail, different size and shape wings from the DC-9. They are not alike at all.</p>
<p>The China CS-star is someone&#8217;s model. No such plane exists, so comparing it is useless. Besides, it does look anything alike.</p>
<p>My point is, if it has wings, a tail, engines, and a fuselage, all civilian aircraft of the same class look almost identical. Compare Airbus planes with Boeing if you don&#8217;t believe me. Just because it is Chinese doesn&#8217;t make it a copy. The Japanese have copied american and European designs in the past too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keoki</title>
		<link>http://blog.flightstory.net/526/chinese-aircraft-look-a-likes/#comment-71403</link>
		<author>Keoki</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.flightstory.net/526/chinese-aircraft-look-a-likes/#comment-71403</guid>
					<description>Quoting Centrist, "China’s arj-21 as you can see, has different engines, a differently shaped tail, different size and shape wings from the DC-9. They are not alike at all."

You're kidding right?  Say no to drugs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quoting Centrist, &#8220;China’s arj-21 as you can see, has different engines, a differently shaped tail, different size and shape wings from the DC-9. They are not alike at all.&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re kidding right?  Say no to drugs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince Mercer</title>
		<link>http://blog.flightstory.net/526/chinese-aircraft-look-a-likes/#comment-99798</link>
		<author>Vince Mercer</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 07:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.flightstory.net/526/chinese-aircraft-look-a-likes/#comment-99798</guid>
					<description>It's not Surprising. The Chinese are prominent for being copycats. Not just aircraft.  Even guns, like the Chinese Type-56 Assault rifle.  They also copied designer bags, and sold it with the same logo, but not the same price and authenticity. They copied, designer shoes as well.

Are they to be convicted for these? No.  Most companies in the world depend on China for Manufacturing, in exchange (with or without their permission) the blue prints for the product is theirs to copy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not Surprising. The Chinese are prominent for being copycats. Not just aircraft.  Even guns, like the Chinese Type-56 Assault rifle.  They also copied designer bags, and sold it with the same logo, but not the same price and authenticity. They copied, designer shoes as well.</p>
<p>Are they to be convicted for these? No.  Most companies in the world depend on China for Manufacturing, in exchange (with or without their permission) the blue prints for the product is theirs to copy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

