<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Air Berlin with New Identity</title>
	<link>http://blog.flightstory.net/522/air-berlin-with-new-identity/</link>
	<description>The Aviation Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 02:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Gilbert</title>
		<link>http://blog.flightstory.net/522/air-berlin-with-new-identity/#comment-13296</link>
		<author>Gilbert</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.flightstory.net/522/air-berlin-with-new-identity/#comment-13296</guid>
					<description>A new logo was definetely needed, but indeed, the one chosen by the company has no meaning and shows a lack of artistic value.  Additionally, the current NEW logo will visually clash on the other side of the aircraft with regards to its inclination.

I personally thought that maybe the logo should have been changed to a bear, in resemblance of the Berlin City logo.  Even then, the name tends to be too regional.  Perhaps changing the name back to Germania or Air Germania would give it a better image against Lufthansa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new logo was definetely needed, but indeed, the one chosen by the company has no meaning and shows a lack of artistic value.  Additionally, the current NEW logo will visually clash on the other side of the aircraft with regards to its inclination.</p>
<p>I personally thought that maybe the logo should have been changed to a bear, in resemblance of the Berlin City logo.  Even then, the name tends to be too regional.  Perhaps changing the name back to Germania or Air Germania would give it a better image against Lufthansa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
