<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SAS removes Dash 8 Q400 from service permanently</title>
	<link>http://blog.flightstory.net/365/sas-removes-dash-8-q400-from-service-permanently/</link>
	<description>The Aviation Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Martin W</title>
		<link>http://blog.flightstory.net/365/sas-removes-dash-8-q400-from-service-permanently/#comment-6422</link>
		<author>Martin W</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.flightstory.net/365/sas-removes-dash-8-q400-from-service-permanently/#comment-6422</guid>
					<description>It's about time. Four landing accidents in a fleet of 20-plus aircraft in the space of only two months is enough to run the confidence to the very bottom. I believe that SAS is doing the right thing. Bombardier should do much better than claim that there has been no systemic failure in the ladning gear  - not after the fourth incident in a row.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s about time. Four landing accidents in a fleet of 20-plus aircraft in the space of only two months is enough to run the confidence to the very bottom. I believe that SAS is doing the right thing. Bombardier should do much better than claim that there has been no systemic failure in the ladning gear  - not after the fourth incident in a row.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bemused26</title>
		<link>http://blog.flightstory.net/365/sas-removes-dash-8-q400-from-service-permanently/#comment-69450</link>
		<author>Bemused26</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.flightstory.net/365/sas-removes-dash-8-q400-from-service-permanently/#comment-69450</guid>
					<description>Well, I didn't realise there had been so many incidents with this plane. Have you seen the news today? One of these aircraft has crashed into a house in Buffalo, USA killing all 48 people on board and 1 person on the ground. It is horrific. My heart goes out to anyone who lost anyone today from that crash. How come it is still in service if it is so incident prone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I didn&#8217;t realise there had been so many incidents with this plane. Have you seen the news today? One of these aircraft has crashed into a house in Buffalo, USA killing all 48 people on board and 1 person on the ground. It is horrific. My heart goes out to anyone who lost anyone today from that crash. How come it is still in service if it is so incident prone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

